- $2 Million Unanimous Jury Verdict
- Watt Announces One-Year Extensions Ford HARP and HAMP
- Saxon Settles HAMP Class Action for $4.5 Million… A win for homeowners, LOL
- Tumultuous Year Results in Half-Billion Dollar Loss for Ocwen
- Report: Short Sales, REO Experience Largest Increase in Three Years
- LEGISLATION TO EXTEND TAX RELIEF TO DISTRESSED HOMEOWNERS CURRENTLY IN HOUSE, SENATE COMMITTEES
- Negative Equity Remains a ‘Serious Issue’ Despite Year-Over-Year Decline
- 8 Real-Life Haunted Houses for Sale
JCL Realty - News
Saxon Settles HAMP Class Action for $4.5 Million… A win for homeowners, LOL
April 15, 2015
A class action law suit filed against Saxon Mortgage Services/Morgan Stanley alleged that the servicer improperly denied thousands of California homeowners loan modifications through the federal Home Affordable Modification Plan (HAMP), and as a result, some lost their homes to foreclosure unnecessarily.
No kidding? Well, now there’s a story I haven’t heard more than a few thousand times… this month.
A servicer improperly denied homeowners when they applied for loan modifications? Let me guess, did the servicer lose paperwork submitted by the homeowners multiple times? Did they tell people they failed the NPV test without providing any reason as to why they failed the test? Did they tell some homeowners they made too much money and then later that they didn’t make enough? Or, did they just keep asking the homeowner for additional documents over and over again until the homeowners ran screaming from their homes?
Shocking, positively shocking… or it would be, if I were writing this back in 2009.
It’s 2015, however, and reading a story about a servicer denying loan modifications and foreclosing when they shouldn’t have is like taking a walk down memory lane. Is Treasury threatening to withhold payments under HAMP until the servicer gets their act together and learns how to deny loan modifications for more opaque reasons?
Did the homeowners discover that their homes had been sold when they came home one day to find investors standing on their porches trying to peer into their windows? Did they foreclose on any homes that they turned out not to own in the first place? How many of the homeowners were foreclosed on while they were making trial payments?
Is anyone even paying attention to this sort of story anymore? Does anyone even care? I mean, it’s only happened a few million times over the last so many years, so what’s the big deal? So, the bank takes back a house after telling the homeowner that he or she has been approved for a loan modification… that sort of thing barely made headlines in 2010… today, it’s like hearing the weatherman report the weather in San Diego. It’s sunny and 75 today… yawn.
The class was defined as “California borrowers who entered into Homeowners Affordable Modification Program TPPs with Saxon through Oct. 1, 2009, and made at least three trial period payments but did not receive HAMP loan modifications.”
Nice, so these folks were actually granted trial modifications, celebrated, then made their required three payments as agreed… and then got the proverbial rug pulled out from under them with no recourse… sorry about that, but it’s only a home… it’s not like we’re talking about something life-changing or that cost a lot.
According to a story on Law 360.com, “the settlement would pay the 1,365 class members who lost their homes after Saxon denied them permanent loan modifications roughly 30 percent of the trial payments they had made.”
However, the story then reported that “Saxon would pay approximately 2,705 class members an average of $1,663 each, before accounting for attorneys’ fees and other costs,” and that the settlement represented about 15 percent of the roughly $30 million in total trial payments made by the class.
And then it said, “All plaintiffs would receive a base award of about $184, with tiered payments going to those who lost their homes in foreclosures or short sales without being offered loan modifications.”
Now, I would normally stop and try to figure out what the heck was being said in the three paragraphs above, but honestly, I don’t actually care what the details were, or for that matter whether someone receives $1,663 or $184 for having their home taken away from them while making the payments as requested by the servicer. If it were me, and I got a check for $184 after losing my home while making payments, I think I’d be tempted to check the Internet to see how much small pox virus or Anthrax I could purchase with my winnings.
What’s truly incredible though is that no one will do anything to seek revenge… in fact, no one will even complain out loud.
Think about this story for a moment… a thousand homeowners, give or take, were going through the loan modification process, when they were told “Congratulations, you’ve been approved for a trial modification.” And then they all started making their payments and just when they were starting to sleep a little better than they had in many months, Saxon sold their homes anyway.
And some are getting $184… or $1,663… or whatever.
Well, okay then… that should take care of it, I would think. I mean, I bought our home in 1990 for $340,000… so it’s been about 25 years, during which time we’ve probably put a couple hundred grand into it for one reason or another. So, if someone takes it back when they shouldn’t have, I really don’t think I need more than dinner for four at an Outback Steak House to call it even… well, minus legal fees and other costs, of course.